home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Path: news.clark.net!phzzzt!mfaurot
- From: mfaurot@phzzzt.atww.org (Michael Faurot)
- Subject: Re: SupraSonic & v.34+ ?
- X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
- Organization: ATWW
- Message-ID: <1996Apr16.030903.28296@phzzzt.atww.org>
- References: <4kbms9$37u@guysmiley.blarg.net> <4kf48u$pfl@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4ktuhk$sst@v_mail.supra.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 03:09:03 GMT
-
- Matt J. (mattj@supra.com) wrote:
-
- : Actually, the Sonic does have a new and different DSP than the ones
- : in SupraFAXModem 288's. Ontop of the added throughput it provides it
- : has voice functions that are always DSP specific. The fact that it has
- : voice and the SFM does not would immediately indicate that the DSP
- : is at least different. The Sonic is also our first modem to support
- : 230kbps port speeds. 33.6 is not currently supported by the Sonic as
- : you suspect.
-
- Let's get to the bottom line please. Is the Sonic's DSP capable of
- being flash upgraded to support 33.6?
-
- --
- +----------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
- | Michael Faurot | mfaurot@phzzzt.atww.org | I programmed COBOL in college. |
- | ------- ------ | ------- ------ ---- --- | But I never compiled . . . :-) |
- +----------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+
-